Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👍 change array argument types to readonly #262

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

👍 change array argument types to readonly #262

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

Milly
Copy link
Contributor

@Milly Milly commented Aug 26, 2024

These functions do not update the arrays passed as arguments, so we should be able to pass readonly arrays.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced type safety and inference for the builtinOpts array, improving TypeScript's autocompletion and type-checking capabilities.
    • Updated function signatures to enforce immutability for input parameters across various functions, promoting safer handling of data.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating various function signatures across multiple files to enhance type safety and immutability in TypeScript. Specifically, parameters have been modified to use readonly arrays, preventing unintended modifications. Additionally, the builtinOpts constant has been declared with as const, allowing for better type inference and ensuring that the values remain immutable.

Changes

Files Change Summary
argument/flags.ts, argument/mod.ts, argument/opts.ts Updated function signatures to use readonly arrays for parameters, enhancing type safety and immutability. Modified builtinOpts in argument/opts.ts to include as const for improved type inference.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagrams generated as the changes are straightforward and do not involve complex interactions.)

Poem

🐰 In the code, a change so bright,
With as const, it takes to flight.
Type safety now leaps and bounds,
In built-in options, joy abounds!
A tuple dance, so neat and clear,
Hooray for types, let's give a cheer! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dae0f5e and d6afc3f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • argument/opts.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • argument/opts.ts

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 26.66667% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.39%. Comparing base (dae0f5e) to head (38bb82b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
argument/flags.ts 12.50% 7 Missing ⚠️
argument/opts.ts 33.33% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #262      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.56%   82.39%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        2971     2977       +6     
  Branches      251      251              
==========================================
  Hits         2453     2453              
- Misses        516      522       +6     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6afc3f and 38bb82b.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • argument/flags.ts (4 hunks)
  • argument/mod.ts (1 hunks)
  • argument/opts.ts (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • argument/opts.ts
Additional comments not posted (5)
argument/mod.ts (1)

Line range hint 100-104: LGTM!

The change to use readonly string[] enhances type safety by ensuring that the input array cannot be modified within the function. This promotes immutability and aligns with best practices.

The code changes are approved.

argument/flags.ts (4)

Line range hint 36-58: LGTM!

The change to use readonly string[] enhances type safety by ensuring that the input array cannot be modified within the function. This promotes immutability and aligns with best practices.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 89-96: LGTM!

The change to use readonly string[] for knownAttributes enhances type safety by ensuring that the known attributes list cannot be modified within the function. This promotes immutability and aligns with best practices.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 122-130: LGTM!

The change to use readonly string[] for value enhances type safety by ensuring that the input array cannot be modified within the function. This promotes immutability and aligns with best practices.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 160-168: LGTM!

The change to use readonly string[] for includes enhances type safety by ensuring that the input array cannot be modified within the function. This promotes immutability and aligns with best practices.

The code changes are approved.

@Milly Milly changed the title 👍 change the export valiable to const literals array 👍 change array argument types to readonly Aug 26, 2024
@Milly Milly requested a review from lambdalisue August 26, 2024 12:39
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 0fe0e5e into main Aug 26, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the asconst branch August 26, 2024 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants