Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add in option for Java JSON APIs to do column pruning in CUDF #16796

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-24.10
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

revans2
Copy link
Contributor

@revans2 revans2 commented Sep 11, 2024

Description

This adds in the options to enable column_pruning when reading JSON using the java APIs.

This is still in draft because there are test failures if this is turned on for those tests.

#16797

That said the performance impact from enabling column pruning on some queries is huge. For one query in particular the current code takes 161.5 seconds and with CUDF column pruning it is just 16.5 seconds. That is a 10x speedup for something that is fairly real world.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

Signed-off-by: Robert (Bobby) Evans <bobby@apache.org>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Java Affects Java cuDF API. label Sep 11, 2024
@revans2 revans2 added 0 - Blocked Cannot progress due to external reasons Performance Performance related issue Spark Functionality that helps Spark RAPIDS improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0 - Blocked Cannot progress due to external reasons improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function Java Affects Java cuDF API. non-breaking Non-breaking change Performance Performance related issue Spark Functionality that helps Spark RAPIDS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant