Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension for QuPhys.jl #51

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

Extension for QuPhys.jl #51

merged 12 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

ytdHuang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (9975f70) 94.71% compared to head (5fcab60) 94.62%.

Files Patch % Lines
ext/HierarchicalEOM_QuPhysExt.jl 83.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #51      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.71%   94.62%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          22       23       +1     
  Lines        1513     1525      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         1433     1443      +10     
- Misses         80       82       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ytdHuang
Copy link
Member Author

ytdHuang commented Feb 2, 2024

Waiting for qutip/QuantumToolbox.jl#15 to be merged

@ytdHuang ytdHuang marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2024 10:32
@ytdHuang ytdHuang merged commit c5b129d into main Feb 5, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
@ytdHuang ytdHuang deleted the dev/QuPhysExt branch February 5, 2024 03:41
@ytdHuang ytdHuang restored the dev/QuPhysExt branch February 5, 2024 14:53
@ytdHuang ytdHuang deleted the dev/QuPhysExt branch February 5, 2024 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant