Benchmark the performance of the described frameworks: For article: http://www.tellmehow.co/reactive-programming-comparison-spring-5-v-s-vert-x
##The performance test will simulate:
- 100 concurrent users
- 50,000 requests
The performance tests which I have executed have been performed on a machine with the following parameters:
| OS | Fedora 27 |
| CPU | Intel(R) Quad Core(TM) i5 @ 2.67GHz |
| Memory | 8GB DDR3 |
Starting the test Waiting for possible Shutdown/StopTestNow/Heapdump message on port 4445 summary + 49725 in 00:00:09 = 5345.0/s Avg: 11 Min: 0 Max: 499 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 14 Started: 100 Finished: 86 summary + 275 in 00:00:00 = 4583.3/s Avg: 1 Min: 0 Max: 11 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 0 Started: 100 Finished: 100 summary = 50000 in 00:00:09 = 5339.6/s Avg: 11 Min: 0 Max: 499 Err: 0 (0.00%) Tidying up … … end of run
Starting the test Waiting for possible Shutdown/StopTestNow/Heapdump message on port 4445 summary + 5298 in 00:00:03 = 2085.0/s Avg: 26 Min: 0 Max: 454 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 100 Started: 100 Finished: 0 summary + 44702 in 00:00:10 = 4517.2/s Avg: 15 Min: 0 Max: 535 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 0 Started: 100 Finished: 100 summary = 50000 in 00:00:12 = 4020.3/s Avg: 16 Min: 0 Max: 535 Err: 0 (0.00%) Tidying up … … end of run
The results on my machine show that Vert.x can handle 50 000 requests 3 seconds faster than Spring 5.
NOTE: The Vert.x application is built on top of its latest stable version which is 3.4.2, while Spring 5 is in a release candidate phase.