-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Max retry for vendor payment limit #637
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new function, Changes
Poem
Tip We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/netsuite/tasks.py (1)
1168-1189
: Approved: New function to determine whether to skip payment processing.The new
validate_for_skipping_payment
function implements the business logic to determine whether to skip processing a payment based on the age and update status of the related task log.Consider the following refinements:
- Simplify the nested if-elif statements into a single if statement, as suggested by the static analysis hint:
if (now - relativedelta(months=2) > task_log.created_at) or \ (now - relativedelta(months=1) > task_log.created_at and task_log.updated_at > now - relativedelta(months=1)) or \ (task_log.updated_at > now - relativedelta(weeks=1)): return True
- Extract the magic numbers for months and weeks into constants:
TWO_MONTHS = relativedelta(months=2) ONE_MONTH = relativedelta(months=1) ONE_WEEK = relativedelta(weeks=1)Then use the constants in the if conditions for better readability.
Tools
Ruff
1184-1186: Use a single
if
statement instead of nestedif
statements(SIM102)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
apps/netsuite/tasks.py
1184-1186: Use a single
if
statement instead of nestedif
statements(SIM102)
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/netsuite/tasks.py (1)
1217-1219
: Approved: Enhanced payment processing logic.The changes made to the
create_vendor_payment
function incorporate the newvalidate_for_skipping_payment
function to conditionally skip payment processing based on the related task log's timing. This enhances the control flow and functionality of the payment creation process.Also applies to: 1231-1233
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/test_netsuite/test_tasks.py (1)
1887-1887
: Remove unused variable.The
bill
variable is assigned but never used. Consider removing this line.- bill = Bill.create_bill(expense_group)
Tools
Ruff
1887-1887: Local variable
bill
is assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
bill
(F841)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/test_netsuite/test_tasks.py (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
tests/test_netsuite/test_tasks.py
1887-1887: Local variable
bill
is assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
bill
(F841)
1902-1902:
timezone
may be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1904-1904:
timedelta
may be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1912-1912:
timedelta
may be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1914-1914:
timedelta
may be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/test_netsuite/test_tasks.py (1)
1902-1902
: Verify missing imports.Some entities like
timezone
andtimedelta
are used but may not be imported. Please ensure the necessary imports are present.To verify, search for the import statements in the file:
If the imports are missing, add them at the beginning of the file:
from datetime import timedelta from django.utils import timezoneAlso applies to: 1904-1904, 1912-1912, 1914-1914
Tools
Ruff
1902-1902:
timezone
may be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/netsuite/migrations/0026_auto_20240902_1650.py (1 hunks)
- apps/netsuite/models.py (2 hunks)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py
Additional comments not posted (22)
apps/netsuite/models.py (22)
Line range hint
32-45
: LGTM!The
CustomSegment
model class looks good and follows the standard Django model structure.
378-378
: LGTM!The new
is_retired
field is added correctly to theBill
model with a default value ofFalse
.
Line range hint
468-488
:
Line range hint
620-638
:
Line range hint
706-724
:
796-796
: LGTM!The new
is_retired
field is added correctly to theExpenseReport
model with a default value ofFalse
.
Line range hint
874-893
:
Line range hint
1007-1022
:
Line range hint
1092-1108
:
Line range hint
1230-1244
:
Line range hint
22-35
:
Line range hint
38-65
:
Line range hint
68-95
:
Line range hint
98-106
:
Line range hint
109-119
:
Line range hint
122-132
:
Line range hint
135-154
:
Line range hint
157-184
:
Line range hint
187-226
:
Line range hint
229-241
:
Line range hint
244-268
:
Line range hint
270-288
:
migrations.AddField( | ||
model_name='bill', | ||
name='is_retired', | ||
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | ||
), | ||
migrations.AddField( | ||
model_name='expensereport', | ||
name='is_retired', | ||
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | ||
), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rename the field to align with the intended purpose.
There is an inconsistency between the field name is_retired
and the help text "Is Payment sync retried". The field name suggests a retired state, while the help text and the PR title "Max retry for vendor payment limit" indicate that the field is intended to track the retry state of payment sync.
To align the field name with the intended purpose, apply this diff:
migrations.AddField(
model_name='bill',
- name='is_retired',
+ name='is_payment_sync_retried',
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'),
),
migrations.AddField(
model_name='expensereport',
- name='is_retired',
+ name='is_payment_sync_retried',
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'),
),
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
migrations.AddField( | |
model_name='bill', | |
name='is_retired', | |
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | |
), | |
migrations.AddField( | |
model_name='expensereport', | |
name='is_retired', | |
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | |
), | |
migrations.AddField( | |
model_name='bill', | |
name='is_payment_sync_retried', | |
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | |
), | |
migrations.AddField( | |
model_name='expensereport', | |
name='is_payment_sync_retried', | |
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | |
), |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py (5 hunks)
- tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (3)
Line range hint
1-1
: LGTM!The changes to the
public.bills
table are approved. The newis_retired
column can be used to manage the lifecycle of records in the table.
Line range hint
1-1
: LGTM!The changes to the
public.expense_reports
table are approved. The newis_retired
column can be used to manage the lifecycle of records in the table.
Line range hint
1-1
: LGTM!The changes to the database dump version and the migration sequence value are approved. They are consistent with the addition of a new migration related to the changes made to the
public.bills
andpublic.expense_reports
tables.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/netsuite/tasks.py
* Max retry for vendor payment limit * test added * added is_retried logic * added is_retried * fixed test * bug fix
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Tests