Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BMC: support full LTL #712

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

BMC: support full LTL #712

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

Full LTL is supported by the word-level BMC engine.

@kroening kroening marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2024 00:05
@kroening kroening force-pushed the BMC-full-LTL branch 6 times, most recently from d9c02b5 to fa9bdf4 Compare September 22, 2024 18:16
Full LTL is supported by the word-level BMC engine.
Comment on lines 41 to +43
bool bmc_supports_LTL_property(const exprt &expr)
{
// We support
// * formulas that contain no temporal operator besides X
// * Gφ, where φ contains no temporal operator besides X
// * Fφ, where φ contains no temporal operator besides X
// * GFφ, where φ contains no temporal operator besides X
// * conjunctions of supported LTL properties
auto non_X_LTL_operator = [](const exprt &expr)
{ return is_LTL_operator(expr) && expr.id() != ID_X; };

if(!has_subexpr(expr, non_X_LTL_operator))
{
return true;
}
else if(expr.id() == ID_F)
{
return !has_subexpr(to_F_expr(expr).op(), non_X_LTL_operator);
}
else if(expr.id() == ID_G)
{
auto &op = to_G_expr(expr).op();
if(op.id() == ID_F)
{
return !has_subexpr(to_F_expr(op).op(), non_X_LTL_operator);
}
else
{
return !has_subexpr(op, non_X_LTL_operator);
}
}
else if(expr.id() == ID_and)
{
for(auto &op : expr.operands())
if(!bmc_supports_LTL_property(op))
return false;
return true;
}
else
return false;
return true;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this function just be removed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Look at the pretty symmetry of bmc_supports_property(...)!

@kroening kroening merged commit 8d678b6 into main Sep 24, 2024
8 checks passed
@kroening kroening deleted the BMC-full-LTL branch September 24, 2024 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants