Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

git promise type used a wrong command line option #97

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

basvandervlies
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@vpodzime vpodzime left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@craigcomstock craigcomstock changed the title git promise tyoe used a wrong command line option git promise type used a wrong command line option Jun 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@craigcomstock craigcomstock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Bas!

@vpodzime vpodzime merged commit 2ce7daa into cfengine:master Jun 18, 2024
1 check passed
@vpodzime
Copy link
Contributor

@olehermanse @larsewi I guess now we want to release a new version of the module?

larsewi added a commit to larsewi/build-index that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
New version contains bugfix (see
cfengine/modules#97)

Ticket: None
Changelog: None
Signed-off-by: Lars Erik Wik <lars.erik.wik@northern.tech>
@larsewi
Copy link
Contributor

larsewi commented Jun 18, 2024

@olehermanse @larsewi I guess now we want to release a new version of the module?

@vpodzime see cfengine/build-index#499

larsewi added a commit to larsewi/build-index that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
New version contains bugfix (see
cfengine/modules#97)

Ticket: None
Changelog: None
Signed-off-by: Lars Erik Wik <lars.erik.wik@northern.tech>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants