Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gives all status effects an ID #26880

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DGamerL
Copy link
Member

@DGamerL DGamerL commented Sep 23, 2024

What Does This PR Do

Adds some sanity to see if status effects have an ID
Adds missing IDs to status effects
transient and incapacitating technically didn't require an ID but they got one anyways

Why It's Good For The Game

This makes it easier to see if someone forgot to set an ID for a status effect which could cause some unintended behaviour (looking at you cling)

Testing

Gave myself all status effects without any runtimes
image


Declaration

  • I confirm that I either do not require pre-approval for this PR, or I have obtained such approval and have included a screenshot to demonstrate this below.

Changelog

NPFC

@ParadiseSS13-Bot ParadiseSS13-Bot added the -Status: Awaiting type assignment This PR is waiting for its type to be assigned internally label Sep 23, 2024
code/datums/status_effects/buffs.dm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code/datums/status_effects/buffs.dm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DGamerL and others added 2 commits September 23, 2024 15:45
Co-authored-by: 1080pCat <96908085+1080pCat@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: DGamerL <108773801+DGamerL@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 1080pCat <96908085+1080pCat@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: DGamerL <108773801+DGamerL@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-Status: Awaiting type assignment This PR is waiting for its type to be assigned internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants