Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let ignoreMass, massOffset, etc work for bimodal engines #2795

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2023

Conversation

lpgagnon
Copy link
Contributor

@lpgagnon lpgagnon commented Mar 5, 2023

fixes #2794

@al2me6
Copy link
Member

al2me6 commented Mar 6, 2023

IMO you should just change the original patch to target Module*EngineConfigs instead.

@lpgagnon
Copy link
Contributor Author

lpgagnon commented Mar 6, 2023

I'd worry about that catching things it shouldn't, but whatever maintainers think is best.

(that is how it was handled for the new testflight system)

@Capkirk123
Copy link
Member

Capkirk123 commented Mar 6, 2023

I also support converting everything to Module*EngineConfigs, all of those patches should be safe to run on ModuleBimodalEngineConfigs.

@lpgagnon
Copy link
Contributor Author

lpgagnon commented Mar 6, 2023

I can change them all in this PR, but I won't test anything beyond what I've already tested

@lpgagnon
Copy link
Contributor Author

lpgagnon commented Mar 6, 2023

done. KSP-RO/ROEngines#188 still works with the switchover; no further testing done

@lpgagnon lpgagnon changed the title Let ignoreMass, massOffset work for bimodal engines Let ignoreMass, massOffset, etc work for bimodal engines Mar 6, 2023
@Capkirk123
Copy link
Member

Tested, nothing obviously breaks. Should be good to go.

@siimav siimav merged commit 3aa0494 into KSP-RO:master Mar 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EngineVariants_Config.cfg doesn't support bimodal engines
4 participants