Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential fix of bug allowing a scan to be saved in invalid location #1365

Conversation

TommyDL-Infomaniak
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@TommyDL-Infomaniak TommyDL-Infomaniak added bug Something isn't working quick A pull request consisting of a few lines labels Jul 24, 2024
@TommyDL-Infomaniak TommyDL-Infomaniak requested a review from a team July 24, 2024 09:12
@TommyDL-Infomaniak TommyDL-Infomaniak self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@TommyDL-Infomaniak TommyDL-Infomaniak added the rebase Add this label to rebase the PR label Jul 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the rebase Add this label to rebase the PR label Jul 24, 2024
@KevinBoulongne KevinBoulongne force-pushed the fix/allowed-to-save-scanned-document-without-valid-destination branch from 8bb08f9 to 92493e0 Compare July 24, 2024 13:18
@TommyDL-Infomaniak TommyDL-Infomaniak added the rebase Add this label to rebase the PR label Jul 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the rebase Add this label to rebase the PR label Jul 29, 2024
@KevinBoulongne KevinBoulongne force-pushed the fix/allowed-to-save-scanned-document-without-valid-destination branch from 032e32b to 8158218 Compare July 29, 2024 12:33
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 29, 2024

@tevincent tevincent merged commit e350868 into master Jul 30, 2024
4 checks passed
@tevincent tevincent deleted the fix/allowed-to-save-scanned-document-without-valid-destination branch July 30, 2024 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working quick A pull request consisting of a few lines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants