Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update deep-source.yml #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Update deep-source.yml #10

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Aug 13, 2024

Description by Korbit AI

Note

This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Update the test coverage report path in deep-source.yml from ./Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml to ./Tests/POCBlockchain.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml.

Why are these changes being made?

The test coverage report path was incorrect and pointed to a non-existent or outdated directory. This change corrects the path to ensure accurate test coverage reporting for the POCBlockchain tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the CI/CD workflow to change the test coverage report file path, now focusing on the POCBlockchain project rather than POCTemplate. This ensures improved accuracy in coverage reporting related to the current project structure.

Copy link

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
    • Changing the value-file path from ./Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml to ./Tests/POCBlockchain.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml may lead to inaccurate or missing test coverage reports if the correct file is not generated or located.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
    • Consider using variables or relative paths to the test coverage file paths to avoid hardcoded paths that might change or lead to errors in the future.
    • Add error-handling mechanisms to check if the test coverage file exists before attempting to generate a report to ensure the process does not fail unexpectedly.

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Aug 13, 2024

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

Copy link

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

  • 🛠️ Updated the file path in the deep-source.yml configuration file to reflect the correct test coverage report location.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
001 ❓Others The change updates the file path for the test coverage report. Ensure the new path is correct and the file exists. 🟠Medium 🟠Medium

Issue 001: Ensure the new path is correct and the file exists

  • Explanation: The change updates the file path for the test coverage report from ./Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml to ./Tests/POCBlockchain.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml. It's crucial to verify that the new path is correct and the file exists to avoid runtime errors.
  • Code: No code change required.
  • Fix: Verify the existence of the file at the new path.

Missing Tests

No new tests are required for this configuration change. However, ensure that the CI/CD pipeline runs successfully with the updated path to validate the change.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
React or reply to let me know your opinion!

Copy link
Contributor

deepsource-io bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits e13cd42..5c480de. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) August 13, 2024 22:17
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e13cd42 and 5c480de.

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve updating a CI/CD workflow for a .NET project, specifically altering the path for the test coverage report. This adjustment signifies a shift in focus from one test suite to another, indicating possible reorganization within the project structure or components being tested.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml Updated coverage report path from ./Tests/POCTemplate.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml to ./Tests/POCBlockchain.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code does thrive,
A new report helps coverage arrive.
From POCTemplate to Blockchain's cheer,
Our tests now cover what’s truly dear.
With hops of joy, we dance and play,
Celebrating changes in a bright new way! 🥳✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the ☑️ auto-merge Auto merge enabled by gstraccini-bot label Aug 13, 2024
Copy link

instapr bot commented Aug 13, 2024

The file paths in the command seem to have been updated correctly. No further changes required.

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 5f2b59c into main Aug 13, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch August 13, 2024 22:17
Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

10:18PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:18PM INF 6 commits scanned.
10:18PM INF scan completed in 63.9ms
10:18PM INF no leaks found

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☑️ auto-merge Auto merge enabled by gstraccini-bot korbit-code-analysis size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant