Feature: Auto measure label handling

[riedde]

Better handling of Measure labels

• joining labels when multiple measures pointing to same zone (avoids labels like 1/9)
• also works with already joined labels (multiRests)
• introducing diacritical labels (supplied and del)

needs:

• code clean up
• introducing functions (avoid redundancy)

[bwbohl]

@riedde what’s the status of this draft, any chance to resolve conflicts and close TODOs in the near future?

[riedde]

@bwbohl conflicts resolved. I'll have a look at the TODOs

[bwbohl]

What’s an appropriate dataset for testing this?

[riedde]

@bwbohl e.g., https://klarinettenquintett.weber-gesamtausgabe.de/index.html?lang=de (Erstdruck 1)

[bwbohl]

Tested with the klarinettenquintett dataset:

• label seem correct but Concordance navigation fails ,e.g. On Baermann D+-st with the multirest in Allegro/Klarinette M.1–11 ff.

[bwbohl]

The multiRest at the start of the Allegro in D+-st is also missing "–11"

[bwbohl]

multiRest handling doesn’t seem to work properly with data-set klarinettenquintett

[krHERO]

ping @nikobeer

[bwbohl]

please fix multiRest handling

[bwbohl]

pinging @riedde

[riedde]

@bwbohl I reviewed the function measure:getMeasureLabel(). It seems that there was an else case missing (added at 14837c2). I'm not sure if this coveres all cases but it is much more better than before and works with several datasets. I can offer you my dataset for testing if you like (three editions).

[riedde]

While testing I noticed that there is a bug when loading the measure based view with parts. I have to investigate this.