Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update opts in Dockerfiles using ubi8 OpenJDK #1341

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jerboaa
Copy link

@jerboaa jerboaa commented Oct 19, 2023

The semantics of JAVA_OPTS env is that they remove any default tuning from the UBI 8 OpenJDK image. A better suggestion would be to only append the quarkus specific options to the JVM command line.

That can be done by using JAVA_OPTS_APPEND instead. Using that over JAVA_OPTS has the added benefit that users specifying JAVA_OPTS_APPEND in a deployment config would see their values show up. They wouldn't see them show up if they added an env JAVA_OPTS_APPEND, since JAVA_OPTS is specified in the Dockerfile (overriding any JAVA_OPTS_APPEND use).

The semantics of JAVA_OPTS env is that they remove any default tuning from
the UBI 8 OpenJDK image. A better suggestion would be to only append the
quarkus specific options to the JVM command line.

That can be done by using JAVA_OPTS_APPEND instead. Using that over
JAVA_OPTS has the added benefit that users specifying JAVA_OPTS_APPEND
in a deployment config would see their values show up. They wouldn't see
them show up if they added an env JAVA_OPTS_APPEND, since JAVA_OPTS is
specified in the Dockerfile (overriding any JAVA_OPTS_APPEND use).
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Nov 9, 2023

✔️ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants