You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I gather the roadblock for supporting MongoDB is implementing read_schema. If so, I believe the way forward is to have the implementing method check the DB for whether there is a configured schema: https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/core/schema-validation/
If not, die. If so, just read the schema and use that. Does that accord with your thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I mostly concur, though I was thinking instead of die when we see something without a valid JSON schema, we read the collection names and configure them as just type => 'object'. Then people would still be able to edit the raw JSON object in the editor (indeed we could do multiple things to make that nicer, including showing the raw JSON by default and support for additionalProperties in the editor).
I gather the roadblock for supporting MongoDB is implementing
read_schema
. If so, I believe the way forward is to have the implementing method check the DB for whether there is a configured schema: https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/core/schema-validation/If not,
die
. If so, just read the schema and use that. Does that accord with your thoughts?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: