You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm having an issue where the LE is not well defined. Try changing ds=0.005 on line 70 and you'll see a large point spacing from the stagnation point to the first point followed by progressively smaller point spacing. Could you include a cosine spacing scheme to better define the LE? Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not at all familiar with Glyph or TCL, but I made the following changes locally to obtain cosine spacing and it seems to work if gridPts is an odd number:
line 71:
set d {0}
set gridPts 201
set pi 3.14159
line 78: for {set beta 0} {$beta < [expr {$pi+$pi/$gridPts}]} {set beta [expr {$beta + $pi/$gridPts}]} {lappend x [expr {0.5*(1-cos($beta))}]}
line 83: lappend d [expr $xx]
line 107:
if {$dy == 0} {
set th 0
} else {
set th [expr {atan($dy/$dx)}]
}
This is a random coincidence, I addressed this very issue today in #2 without any foreknowledge of this open issue. @Brandon-Campanile, maybe you could check that out and see if it addresses your issue adequately?
I'm having an issue where the LE is not well defined. Try changing ds=0.005 on line 70 and you'll see a large point spacing from the stagnation point to the first point followed by progressively smaller point spacing. Could you include a cosine spacing scheme to better define the LE? Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: