Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fatxpool: use dyn instead of TransactionPoolWrapper #5489

Open
Tracked by #5472
michalkucharczyk opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #5472

fatxpool: use dyn instead of TransactionPoolWrapper #5489

michalkucharczyk opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@michalkucharczyk
Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.

Comments

@michalkucharczyk
Copy link
Contributor

michalkucharczyk commented Aug 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

More info here: #4639 (comment)

Option (4) shall be implemented.
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk self-assigned this Aug 27, 2024
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk added the T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”. label Aug 27, 2024
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk mentioned this issue Aug 27, 2024
Open
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2024
Open
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk changed the title fatxpool: use dyn instead of ?Sized fatxpool: use dyn instead of TransactionPoolWrapper Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk

Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@michalkucharczyk