You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The SMTCoq plugin (https://smtcoq.github.io/) can be used in Coq to solve some goals automatically. I wonder if we could reuse SmtCoq for solving propositional and first-order goals in matching logic.
Essentially, the plugin converts the goal to a query that is sent to an SMT solver, then takes the proof object generated by the solver, represents it as a term inhabiting some inductive type, and lifts it up to the Coq level. We could reuse the interaction with the SMT, and only write our own conversion from a ML goal to FOL, and then the lifting of the proof object to the type of ML proof.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Section 4.3 in the AML technical report presents a conservative extension theorem for MSFOL, which may be of use when it comes to reasoning about the conversions.
The SMTCoq plugin (https://smtcoq.github.io/) can be used in Coq to solve some goals automatically. I wonder if we could reuse SmtCoq for solving propositional and first-order goals in matching logic.
Essentially, the plugin converts the goal to a query that is sent to an SMT solver, then takes the proof object generated by the solver, represents it as a term inhabiting some inductive type, and lifts it up to the Coq level. We could reuse the interaction with the SMT, and only write our own conversion from a ML goal to FOL, and then the lifting of the proof object to the type of ML proof.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: