Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use the README to explain what this package is about #52

Open
DamienCassou opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Use the README to explain what this package is about #52

DamienCassou opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@DamienCassou
Copy link

The current README says how to use flake-compat but not what it is. It would also be nice to write a description in the project settings.

@shajra
Copy link

shajra commented Mar 6, 2023

Adding to this, I only recently realized there has been a new builtins.getFlake for some time. I'm learning about these things by mimicking other projects. But I think that leads to substandard ideas sticking around.

It would be nice for the README to make clear whether builtins.getFlake is the preferred way to deal with flakes compatibility moving forward. If that's not the case, it would be good to discuss some pros/cons of each approach.

I think the only reason not to use builtins.getFlake is in case someone has a version of Nix older than 2.4. Anything else?

@shajra
Copy link

shajra commented Mar 6, 2023

Coming back to this, I've realized that builtins.getFlake is only usable with flakes enabled. If a user is enabling the feature, I think they are just getting pulled into the world of flakes, properly. This project still seems to server a purpose. It would be good if the README couple explain this all better. I'm still figuring this out myself.

@eclairevoyant
Copy link

eclairevoyant commented Oct 6, 2023

quite simply: this is a flakes polyfill written in pure nix instead of c++
and it's more or less a dead project

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants