Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Worse result than using the Web UI #3

Open
tellierflexus opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Worse result than using the Web UI #3

tellierflexus opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@tellierflexus
Copy link

Hello,
Thank you for your work on this library, it's very cool to have a simple way to integrate.
I've been facing issue while using it. The quality of result sounds robotic compare to using the same parameters with the Web UI. Sound like it was less trained. Any idea where does it come from ? Maybe different pretrained weights ?

Best,
Alexandre

@daswer123
Copy link
Owner

daswer123 commented Jan 9, 2024

Hmm, that's strange because I used the RVC 1006 as a base.

@tellierflexus
Copy link
Author

Any idea how I can troubleshoot that ?

@daswer123
Copy link
Owner

What interface are you using? I'll try to analyze how it works and reproduce it.

@tellierflexus
Copy link
Author

I'm using conda with Python 3.9 on windows, the command line (python -m rvc-python), rmvpe and the following parameters : Feature ratio 0.12
Volume : 0.03
Consonnant : 0.07
Median filter : 3

@daswer123
Copy link
Owner

Okay, I'll try to figure it out, and if I get any results, I'll let you know.

@tellierflexus
Copy link
Author

Thank you very well :)

@rsxdalv
Copy link

rsxdalv commented Sep 6, 2024

Not too likely, but it might be the sample rate getting changed in one case but not the other.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants