Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

automatically populate strand for templated sequence #320

Closed
katiestahl opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

automatically populate strand for templated sequence #320

katiestahl opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@katiestahl
Copy link
Contributor

Feature description

I imagine there's a way to be able to get the strand from the chromosome maybe? We should look into autopopulating the strand like we do in GeneAutocomplete. There may potentially be work for fusor here as well, so I will create a ticket for that and link it. There may be potential for fusor work needed here as well

#314 (comment)

If it doesn't make sense to get the strand based on chromosome or if this isn't possible, please close this issue.

Use case

As a user, I would like to not have to select the strand for a templated sequence, if it's something fusion-curation can retrieve from UTA for me.

Proposed solution

see if we can use chromosome to get the strand

Alternatives considered

No response

Implementation details

No response

Potential Impact

No response

Additional context

No response

Contribution

Yes, I can create a PR for this feature.

@katiestahl katiestahl added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 26, 2024
@jsstevenson
Copy link
Member

jsstevenson commented Aug 27, 2024

Probably not feasible/meaningful -- the idea of this component is that it represents a case where a lil stray chunk of DNA gets hooked onto a molecule. Strandedness matters here as an indication of the direction that the chunk is hooked into (forward or backward), there's no inherent correct answer except for what was observed in the particular fusion. Happy to be corrected, though.

@katiestahl katiestahl closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants