Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling grade in cancers #66

Open
jsstevenson opened this issue Dec 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Handling grade in cancers #66

jsstevenson opened this issue Dec 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:low Low priority

Comments

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Member

Different sources inconsistently provide specific low and/or high grade concepts for some cancers. In the tree- and ontology-based sources, these are usually represented as children of the generic grade-less concept of the specific cancer.

  • Is it possible/desirable to retain that relationship? Practically, is there a way to retrieve both the graded and grade-less concept in one search?
@jsstevenson jsstevenson self-assigned this Oct 26, 2022
@jsstevenson jsstevenson added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 23, 2022
@jsstevenson jsstevenson removed their assignment Aug 27, 2023
@jsstevenson jsstevenson added the priority:medium Medium priority label Sep 9, 2023
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 135 days with no activity. This issue will be closed if no further activity occurs in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 17, 2024
@jsstevenson jsstevenson added priority:low Low priority and removed priority:medium Medium priority stale labels Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant