Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider implementing higher-order 'Amb' overload #1986

Open
bruno-f-cruz opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider implementing higher-order 'Amb' overload #1986

bruno-f-cruz opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@bruno-f-cruz
Copy link
Contributor

bruno-f-cruz commented Sep 2, 2024

This may be ambiguous with the single input overload. However, the single input is also not consistent with the Concat operator. (#1000)

This addition would allow multiple sequences to be subscribed as they are produced and, once one of them produces a value, propagate said sequence and close all others.

Since this overload doesn't seem to exist in rx, we should probably wait to check what comes out of dotnet/reactive#2165

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant