Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: common, high-level step sequences are not standardized or abstract enough #42

Open
jrwdunham opened this issue Nov 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jrwdunham
Copy link
Contributor

There are too many ways being used currently to do the following:

  1. Perform some action, typically initiating a transfer/ingest
  2. Make a series of decisions until something happens:
    • an AIP is created
    • an AIP is available for review
    • a particular micro-service has completed
  3. Perform some second action, given the system/AIP is in the state guaranteed by (2)

We need a clear and memorable way of expressing, with minimal specification, common steps. For example:

When the user makes standard decisions to go from decision point "<DECISON_POINT_A>" to "<DECISON_POINT_B>"

or:

Given a processing config with standard decisions to go from decision point "<DECISON_POINT_A>" to "<DECISON_POINT_B>"

Where "to go from" implicitly assumes a particular sub-chain of the workflow, and "standard decisions" are defined how?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants