Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support new implementation of stac fields querystring parameter #862

Open
EmileSonneveld opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@EmileSonneveld
Copy link
Contributor

On stac.openeo.vito.be, adding '&fields=+properties.proj:epsg' in the query string makes sure this field is included in the results (by default it is hidden)
But when doing the same on stac-openeo-dev.vgt.vito.be, it removes all fields and only shows the one specified. Once this logic is promoted to prod, our stac catalogs will give errors. Best it to specify a list of all properties we need to have no issues in the transition period

Url that shows the issue: https://stac-openeo-dev.vgt.vito.be/search?limit=20&bbox=8.058428808185612%2C40.66%2C8.999%2C41.291280668691115&datetime=2017-12-22T00%3A00%3A00Z%2F2017-12-24T23%3A59%3A58.999000Z&collections=copernicus_r_utm-wgs84_10_m_hrvpp-vi_p_2017-now_v01&fields=+id

Where the code needs to be updated:

for property_name in {"proj:epsg", "proj:bbox", "proj:shape"}.union(all_properties.keys())

(cc @bossie )

@EmileSonneveld
Copy link
Contributor Author

I understood that stac.openeo.vito.be waits for this ticket to be implemented to update their server.

@JeroenVerstraelen
Copy link
Contributor

I checked with Stijn Caerts and he responded with the following

Hey Jeroen, on our side, there is no deadline to complete this issue. The Terrascope and openEO STAC API versions are decoupled, so we have already done the release within Terrascope. The one for openEO can happen when you are ready.

So we can delay this issue until the next sprint.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants