Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DQM Modules should be defined in otsdaq_mu2e_dqm #22

Open
eflumerf opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

DQM Modules should be defined in otsdaq_mu2e_dqm #22

eflumerf opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@eflumerf
Copy link
Contributor

eflumerf commented Mar 8, 2024

@eflumerf
Copy link
Contributor Author

eflumerf commented Mar 8, 2024

Because of this module, for GR-1, otsdaq_mu2e_tracker has to depend on Offline

@pavel1murat
Copy link
Contributor

considerations of modularity favor an organization of a software system in which code corresponding to each subdetector is built independently. In this case an unresolved reference in the calorimeter software, taken as an example, would not prevent the tracker code from running, and vice versa

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants