Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gene name inputs #232

Open
jsstevenson opened this issue Dec 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Gene name inputs #232

jsstevenson opened this issue Dec 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request keep-alive technical debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written. Contrast to "cleanup"

Comments

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Member

          I think that's right. We should come back to this. I think we swap between HGNC and NCBI. We removed the gene normalizer. Maybe we should add it back for this

Originally posted by @korikuzma in #222 (comment)

In UTA-based methods, gene symbols should be HGNC. However, cool_seq_tool.sources.transcript_mappings.TranscriptMappings expects NCBI gene symbols. It'd be nice to get some consistency, although they should agree in most cases.

@jsstevenson jsstevenson added enhancement New feature or request technical debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written. Contrast to "cleanup" labels Jan 31, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Please make a comment for triaging or closing the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request keep-alive technical debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written. Contrast to "cleanup"
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant